A driver who causes a crash because of sun glare may still be responsible for injuries and property damage in Colorado. Bright sunlight does not automatically excuse a driver who fails to use reasonable care. Liability depends on whether the driver responded appropriately to reduced visibility and whether that conduct caused the collision.
If you were injured in a sun glare car accident in Colorado Springs, Colorado, evidence of the driver’s speed, following distance, reactions, and visibility can help establish fault. The Law Firm of Mark S. Hanchey and Ben Peterson can help you evaluate the collision and understand your legal options.
Can a Driver Be Held Liable for a Crash Caused by Sun Glare?
Yes. A driver may be liable when the driver fails to exercise reasonable care despite sunlight that makes the road difficult to see.
For example, continuing at an unsafe speed toward stopped traffic may support a negligence claim, even when the driver says the sun obscured the brake lights ahead.
Colorado Revised Statutes Section 42-4-1101 requires drivers to travel at a speed that is reasonable and prudent under existing conditions. The statute also requires drivers to reduce speed when specified hazards make their otherwise lawful speed unsafe.
Driving below the posted speed limit does not automatically establish that a driver acted carefully.
Key Takeaway: Sun glare is a driving condition, not an automatic defense. The central question is whether a reasonably careful driver would have taken different precautions.
Why Sun Glare Creates Risks on Colorado Springs Roads
Sunrise and sunset can place bright light directly in a driver’s line of sight. In Colorado Springs, the timing of that glare varies with the season, direction of travel, terrain, and nearby buildings.
Reduced visibility can make it harder to:
- See brake lights or stopped vehicles ahead.
- Recognize traffic signals and stop signs.
- Notice people using crosswalks.
- Spot cyclists or motorcyclists.
- Judge distance and approaching traffic.
- React to a changing traffic pattern.
Consider a westbound driver approaching slower traffic during an evening commute. If sunlight makes the vehicles ahead difficult to see, a reasonably careful response may include slowing down and increasing following distance.
Whether the driver took appropriate precautions will depend on the evidence.
With You Every Step of the Journey
When you need legal help, Mark Hanchey and Ben Peterson are here to guide you through it all. One step at a time. Reach out today for legal support. Get The Law Firm of Mark S. Hanchey and Ben Peterson fighting for you.
What Does Colorado Law Require When Visibility Is Limited?
Colorado does not automatically assign fault merely because sunlight contributed to a crash. Instead, the claim is evaluated under traffic laws and negligence principles.
In a typical negligence claim, you must establish four elements:
- Duty of Care: The driver owed other road users a duty to operate the vehicle with reasonable care.
- Breach of Duty: The driver failed to act reasonably under the circumstances.
- Causation: The driver’s conduct caused or contributed to the collision and your injuries.
- Damages: You suffered legally recognized losses, such as medical expenses, lost income, or pain and suffering.
Depending on the road and traffic conditions, reasonable precautions could include:
- Reducing speed when visibility becomes limited.
- Increasing following distance.
- Using a sun visor to reduce direct glare.
- Remaining attentive to traffic signals and surrounding vehicles.
- Safely pulling over when visibility becomes too poor to continue.
The appropriate response depends on the circumstances rather than a fixed rule for every sun glare accident.
Can a Driver Use Sun Glare as a Defense?
A driver can explain that bright sunlight affected visibility, but that statement alone does not establish that a crash was unavoidable.
Investigators may examine when the glare began, whether it was predictable, how long it continued, and whether the driver had an opportunity to react.
For example, a driver may encounter intense glare unexpectedly while approaching an intersection. Investigators would consider whether that driver had sufficient time and opportunity to respond safely.
Compare that situation with a motorist who continues driving for several minutes despite struggling to see the roadway.
If the motorist recognized the hazard but failed to slow down or take reasonable precautions, that conduct may support a negligence claim.
Neither situation should be judged without examining the available evidence.
Bridgette Carabajal
I've had the pleasure of working with Mr. Hanchey on two occasions, and each interaction has been nothing short of exceptional. His professional demeanor, coupled with the outstanding support from his staff significantly alleviated any anxieties I had. I am thoroughly satisfied with the outcomes achieved. Should the need for legal representation arise in the future, Mr. Hanchey will undoubtedly be my first choice.
Lucas Garcia
Mark Hanchey has been excellent. I spoke with him last minute before my court date. He still showed up to court with me and was very caring and helped me before I had even officially hired him. I felt like he cared about me and my case. He knows his craft very well and you can tell that the judge and other attorneys respect him when he is in court. He is also very kind. I recommend him to anyone. An excellent attorney.
Renee Braucht
I had an amazing experience with the Hanchey Law Firm! Mr. Hanchey got me the absolute best result I could have imagined for my case. I can’t even tell you how many times I’ve heard, “wow, you must have had a really good lawyer!” when discussing the result. I live far from Colorado Springs, but I will forever make the trip for this firm when I need them! Highly recommend!
David Walker
I have needed to use a lawyer a couple of times over the past several years and have used Mark Hanchey. He is a very down to earth person who has always treated me with dignity and has always been straight forward. His staff has also been professional and friendly. Each time I used Mark Hanchey the result was a positive one. I also think his fees are reasonable. I cant say enough good about Mark Hanchey.
Who Could Be Responsible for a Sun Glare Collision?
The driver facing the sun may be responsible, but other conduct can also contribute to a crash.
Potentially responsible parties include:
- The Driver Affected by Glare: A motorist may fail to slow down, maintain sufficient following distance, or respond appropriately to surrounding traffic.
- Another Driver: An unsafe lane change, speeding, or another negligent action may contribute to the collision.
- An Employer: In some circumstances, an employer may be legally responsible for negligence committed by an employee acting within the scope of employment.
- Another Legally Responsible Party: Liability may extend beyond the drivers when independent evidence establishes another person’s negligent conduct.
An investigation should identify whose actions caused the collision rather than assigning fault solely according to the direction of the sunlight.
How Does Comparative Negligence Affect Your Colorado Claim?
Colorado uses a modified comparative negligence system under Colorado Revised Statutes Section 13-21-111.
Your compensation can be reduced according to your percentage of negligence. Generally, you cannot recover when your negligence is equal to or greater than the combined negligence attributable to the parties legally compared with you under the applicable rules.
Consider the following example:
- Your total recoverable damages are valued at $100,000.
- You are found 20 percent responsible for the collision.
- Your compensation is reduced by $20,000.
- Your remaining damages total $80,000 before other applicable adjustments.
If your negligence reaches the statutory threshold that bars recovery, you generally cannot obtain compensation under that comparative negligence rule.
An insurance company may question whether you were speeding, following too closely, or otherwise contributing to the accident.
When multiple people contribute to a collision, the allocation of fault requires an evaluation of the individual circumstances.
What Evidence Can Help Prove Fault in a Sun Glare Accident?
Evidence can show what each driver could see and how each person reacted before the crash.
Police Reports and Witness Statements
A police report may record the crash location, statements from the drivers, traffic conditions, and vehicle positions.
Witnesses may describe whether a driver slowed down, failed to obey a traffic signal, made an unsafe lane change, or appeared to brake before impact.
Their observations can help establish how the accident occurred.
Learn more about the importance of witness statements in Colorado car accident cases:
Photographs and Video Footage
Photographs taken shortly after a collision may show:
- The direction of sunlight.
- The roadway and intersection layout.
- Traffic signals and road signs.
- Vehicle damage and final resting positions.
- Surrounding structures that may affect visibility.
Dash camera recordings or nearby surveillance footage may also provide valuable information about driver behavior before impact.
Crash Timing and Sun Position
The exact date, time, location, and direction of travel can help investigators determine the position of the sun when a collision occurred.
This information may help establish whether the reported glare is consistent with the circumstances.
Physical and Vehicle Evidence
Damage patterns, braking evidence, available vehicle data, and accident reconstruction findings may help investigators evaluate speed, reaction time, and the sequence of events.
These findings can be especially useful when drivers provide conflicting explanations.
What Should You Do After a Sun Glare Car Accident?
Protecting your health and preserving evidence are priorities after a collision.
Consider taking the following steps:
- Check for Injuries: Determine whether anyone needs immediate medical assistance and request emergency assistance when necessary.
- Move to Safety: Move to a safe location when you can do so safely and lawfully.
- Exchange Information: Obtain the other driver’s contact details, vehicle information, and insurance information.
- Document the Scene: Photograph vehicle damage, roadway conditions, traffic signals, and the direction of sunlight when safe.
- Collect Witness Information: Obtain contact information from individuals who observed the collision.
- Seek Medical Attention: Obtain appropriate medical evaluation, including for symptoms that develop after the crash.
- Notify Your Insurance Company: Report the collision and provide accurate factual information.
- Consider Legal Advice: Consult an attorney before accepting a disputed fault determination or settlement.
Avoid assuming that sunlight excuses the other driver’s conduct. Likewise, avoid guessing about what another driver could see before the evidence has been evaluated.
What Compensation May Be Available After a Sun Glare Accident?
If another driver’s negligence caused your injuries, Colorado law may allow you to pursue compensation for losses associated with the collision.
Depending on the circumstances, recoverable damages may include:
- Medical Expenses: Emergency treatment, hospitalization, rehabilitation, and other necessary medical care.
- Future Medical Costs: Reasonably anticipated treatment associated with your injuries.
- Lost Wages: Income lost because your injuries prevented you from working.
- Reduced Earning Capacity: Financial losses resulting from a diminished ability to earn income.
- Property Damage: Vehicle repair or replacement costs and other qualifying property losses.
- Pain and Suffering: Physical pain, emotional distress, and other legally recognized noneconomic damages.
The value of your claim depends on the severity of your injuries, available evidence, insurance coverage, comparative negligence, and other applicable legal rules.
How Long Do You Have to File a Sun Glare Accident Claim in Colorado?
Colorado Revised Statutes Section 13-80-101 generally establishes a three-year limitations period for qualifying civil actions involving bodily injury or property damage arising from the use or operation of a motor vehicle.
Exceptions, accrual rules, and the specific circumstances of a claim can affect the applicable deadline.
The presence of sun glare does not automatically create a separate filing period.
Insurance reporting requirements and claims involving other legal theories may also have different timelines.
Prompt action can help preserve information that may become difficult to obtain later, including surveillance footage, witness accounts, and physical evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions About Sun Glare Accidents in Colorado
Can I Sue a Driver Who Hit Me Because the Sun Was in Their Eyes?
Potentially, yes. You may have grounds for a personal injury claim if the driver failed to exercise reasonable care and that conduct caused your injuries.
The driver’s explanation involving sunlight does not automatically prevent you from pursuing compensation.
Is the Driver Who Rear-Ends Another Vehicle Always at Fault?
No. Rear-end collisions often involve questions about following distance, speed, and attentiveness, but liability depends on the circumstances.
Evidence may establish that one or more drivers contributed to the collision.
Can an Insurance Company Deny My Claim Because of Sun Glare?
An insurance company may dispute liability based on the available evidence.
Sun glare alone does not establish that a collision was unavoidable or that the driver exercised reasonable care.
What Happens if Both Drivers Were Affected by Sunlight?
Both drivers’ actions may be examined.
Colorado’s comparative negligence rules can affect compensation when evidence establishes that the injured person also contributed to the collision.
The allocation of fault depends on each driver’s conduct and the available evidence.
Does Sun Glare Change the Deadline for Filing a Car Accident Lawsuit?
Generally, the presence of sun glare does not create a separate lawsuit deadline.
The applicable limitations period depends on the type of claim and the specific facts.
Do I Need an Attorney for a Sun Glare Car Accident Claim?
You are not required to hire an attorney for every car accident claim.
Legal assistance may be valuable when liability is disputed, several parties may share responsibility, injuries are substantial, or an insurance company challenges the cause of the collision.
A Colorado Springs car accident attorney can help assess the evidence, explain the applicable legal standards, and evaluate potential compensation.
Speak With a Colorado Springs Car Accident Attorney About Your Rights
If you were injured in a sun glare car accident in Colorado Springs, Colorado, understanding the circumstances of the collision can help you make informed decisions about your claim.
The Law Firm of Mark S. Hanchey and Ben Peterson assists injured individuals with motor vehicle accident matters.
The firm can review the circumstances of your collision, discuss available evidence, and explain potential legal options.
Serving Colorado Springs and nearby communities, the firm helps clients understand their rights under Colorado personal injury law.
Contact the firm online to request a consultation about your car accident claim.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult an attorney regarding your specific circumstances.
